Donald Trump’s second term as president, which began in January 2025, has been marked by a series of actions that raise profound questions about the future of US-democracy. His policies, both domestic and international, signal a radical departure from traditional governance and reflect a deliberate effort to consolidate executive power while undermining democratic institutions. Trump’s foreign policy has been defined by isolationism. He has withdrawn the United States from key international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris Climate Agreement, while imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court. These moves represent a stark shift from multilateral engagement to an “America First” approach, signaling a retreat from global cooperation.
On immigration, Trump has declared a national emergency at the Mexican border, deployed troops, and tightened detention policies for migrants without valid residency status. Most controversially, he has sought to abolish birthright citizenship—a cornerstone of US-identity enshrined in the Constitution. Meanwhile, his domestic policies include a hiring freeze for federal agencies and the dismissal of key officials, such as the chair of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Under the guise of increasing efficiency, Trump has centralized power, even appointing Elon Musk to lead an administrative reform panel. In economic and energy policy, Trump’s actions have been equally polarizing. He initially imposed tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada before rescinding them but reversed Biden-era bans on oil and gas drilling on federal lands. He also slashed funding for climate protection programs in favor of promoting U.S. energy independence—often at the expense of environmental safeguards. Socially, he has pardoned participants in the January 6 Capitol riot, banned transgender athletes from women’s sports competitions, and eliminated diversity and inclusion initiatives at the federal level.
These measures have not gone unchallenged. Courts have temporarily blocked several executive orders, including his efforts to end birthright citizenship and freeze federal grants. The judiciary remains a critical check on Trump’s ambitions, but with a Supreme Court reshaped during his first term to lean more conservative, its role in adjudicating these challenges will be pivotal.
A Strategy of Overwhelm: Governing by Perception
Trump’s governance style reflects what political analyst Ezra Klein describes as a “flooding tactic.” Drawing on Steve Bannon’s concept of “muzzle velocity,” Trump inundates the public with executive actions to create an illusion of unassailable power. However, many of these measures are either blocked by courts or quietly withdrawn, exposing the limits of his actual authority. Klein argues that this strategy is less about effective governance and more about projecting dominance—a façade that masks the inherent weaknesses of his presidency. This tactic is not without consequences. By overwhelming public discourse with controversial actions, Trump makes it difficult for coherent opposition to form. Yet his historically low approval ratings suggest that his grip on power is more tenuous than it appears.
The Authoritarian Playbook: Undermining Democratic Norms
Historian Timothy Snyder offers a stark warning about Trump’s second term, describing it as part of a “coup from within.” Snyder argues that Trump’s systematic attacks on democratic institutions—such as spreading false claims about election fraud—erode public trust in democracy itself. His pardons for Capitol rioters send a chilling message that violence against democratic institutions may be tolerated or even rewarded. Trump’s rhetoric further deepens polarization by branding critics as “enemies” and demanding unconditional loyalty from supporters. This divisive strategy undermines democratic discourse and fosters an environment hostile to compromise—a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. The president’s attempts to politicize the judiciary and weaken oversight mechanisms are equally troubling. His dismissal of independent agency leaders and sanctions against international judicial bodies like the International Criminal Court point to an effort to consolidate power within the executive branch.
Structural Shifts with Long-Term Implications
Trump’s policies extend beyond immediate political gains; they aim to reshape US-society for decades to come. His push to abolish birthright citizenship could alter the nation’s demographic makeup by excluding certain groups from full participation in democracy. Similarly, cuts to environmental protections and diversity programs reflect an agenda designed to entrench structural inequalities while prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability. Even more concerning are his sustained attacks on press freedom—labeling critical media as “enemies of the people” and attempting to manipulate media narratives in his favor. These efforts threaten one of democracy’s most vital pillars: an independent press capable of holding power accountable.
A Call to Action
Trump’s second term represents more than just policy shifts; it embodies a coordinated attempt to erode democratic norms under the guise of legality. While individual actions may seem isolated or within legal bounds, their cumulative effect paints a troubling picture of democratic backsliding. The danger lies in the gradual nature of this erosion—what Snyder aptly calls a “creeping coup.” If left unchecked, these actions could transform American democracy into an authoritarian system in all but name. The public must remain vigilant and critically question Trump’s portrayal of his power. Judicial intervention will play a crucial role in safeguarding constitutional principles, but preserving democracy ultimately requires active engagement from citizens committed to protecting its foundations before it is too late.
Kommentar schreiben